Thursday, December 02, 2010

T-Mobile sues Johns Creek over cell tower denial.

By Patrick Fox
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

T-Mobile has filed suit in federal court against the city of Johns Creek for denying its application to build a 134-foot cell tower on Rogers Circle in a rural area of the city.

At a meeting attended by dozens of residents in October, the city council voted to deny the telecom company a zoning variance to construct the tower on land currently zoned for agriculture.

It is the second north Fulton city to run into legal troubles with T-Mobile.

Earlier this year, the company filed suit against the city of Milton for denying a similar application. The city ultimately declared a moratorium on new cell tower applications until it could craft a new ordinance, which ultimately passed in August. The revised ordinance calls for a more detailed application process and more restrictive policies regarding location and height of cell towers, primarily for aesthetic purposes. It also institutes a licensing fee.

The Johns Creek decision came after a public hearing in which five people, including a representative of the current owner of the property, spoke against the tower.

Resident Lisa Muzi presented the council with a petition signed by more than 700 residents in opposition to the tower.

Jay Stroman, vice president for advancement at Young Harris College, said as trustee of the property, the college is committed to maintaining its value. A cell tower, he said, could diminish the property value by as much as half, he said.

The college assumed ownership of the property in July, following the death of the former owner whose family had been working with T-Mobile.

City council members pointed out that the proposed site is in one of Johns Creek's last rural areas and contains numerous historic sites. They also said they were not convinced the company explored alternatives to the site.

In its court filing, attorneys for T-Mobile said the company performed all the studies and met all the requirements set out in the city's ordinance. It further acceded to any conditions for landscaping and buffers recommended by the planning staff.

The council's decision, the company attorneys argued, was made in bad faith and has caused T-Mobile unnecessary trouble and expense.

Representatives from Johns Creek and T-Mobile would not comment on the litigation.


Anonymous said...

It's a pleasure to know that T-Mobile has had a very bad year up here in North Fulton.

Anonymous said...

Well, I hope T-Mobile wins a few. Honestly, my cell reception is distorted and barely audible.

Anonymous said...

I guess Verizon and AT &T want all the cell phone business. It's no coincidence that both have large regional facilities here. Quite a few of their employees live in our community. They won't colocate with T Mobile, either. But, they've got agitating their human botnet down to a science. Most of them don't know even know why their neighbor wants them to sign the petition. They say property values or health, but neither of those make sense. I'm not a T Mobile employee, but I don't think T Mobile towers are any uglier than the competition. The health effects are laughable. How many of these people have a cell transmitter in their pants or next to their head? It's a two way system, the one in your hand or pants is much stronger than the one on the tower because it's so much closer.

Anonymous said...

Hoping T Mobile wins the suit with the COM. This company is willing to comply with the "RURAL" character as much as possible. This area needs this service.