tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21862313.post5937894894163044872..comments2024-01-16T19:32:02.006-08:00Comments on .: New Blood Coming To Council In MiltonUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21862313.post-91075000978217458542009-11-24T11:18:46.431-08:002009-11-24T11:18:46.431-08:00Hey, just so you know, I didn't miss the point...Hey, just so you know, I didn't miss the point in any of my articles. Urging someone to drop out of the race is not libel. Calling it a bribe, if not found guilty to that specific charge, is. Just thought I'd clear that up.Jason Wrightnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21862313.post-48818543005099418852009-11-23T13:38:37.572-08:002009-11-23T13:38:37.572-08:00They are attacking Tina for the same reason the fa...They are attacking Tina for the same reason the far left wing radicals are still attacking Sarah Palin. If they weren't threatened by her, they wouldn't bother to comment or keep attacking. Obvious they are. Tina should write a book, and call it "Going Shootin'in Milton".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21862313.post-41482970454129774902009-11-23T13:36:40.965-08:002009-11-23T13:36:40.965-08:00Karen's idea of being creative on a shoestring...Karen's idea of being creative on a shoestring budget is to what exactly, tie half a shoe and fall out of the other one? Can't wait to see her continued plan over the next 4 years in this disaster of an economy and jobless market.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21862313.post-61548802465376689312009-11-17T21:24:16.189-08:002009-11-17T21:24:16.189-08:00Why keep blogging about Tina? The voters spoke, sh...Why keep blogging about Tina? The voters spoke, she lost, and you still can't stop attacking her. I am amazed at the viciousness that comes forth when her name is mentioned.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21862313.post-78701765032492522122009-11-12T14:19:12.825-08:002009-11-12T14:19:12.825-08:00the ethics issue had a negative effect but not eno...the ethics issue had a negative effect but not enough to do her in all by itself<br /><br />several posters made very good points like she got the same percentage as the other bailey candidates... that alone sums it up pretty well but here is another<br /><br />she lost 80-20 in her home district - the people who know her best - where she lives and works - then the overall was 60-40 against<br /><br />if it was simply ethics the results should have been more similar all around town<br /><br />the people who know her best obviously didn't want her back and week in an week out of the campaign she kept adding new reasons to reinforce that<br /><br />she simply ran a very bad campaign but most importantly didn't do anything in three years to warrant a return - according to the voters that isAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21862313.post-90928785088893644332009-11-12T10:12:50.406-08:002009-11-12T10:12:50.406-08:00Here goes the lynch mob again! There has been no r...Here goes the lynch mob again! There has been no ruling in the ethics case. Give it a rest!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21862313.post-10204269410170225702009-11-12T05:51:25.528-08:002009-11-12T05:51:25.528-08:00If you don't give the newspapers something to ...If you don't give the newspapers something to report on, they have no story. <br /><br />Tina provided story after story after story by HER own actions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21862313.post-18337552482338163542009-11-12T05:35:28.561-08:002009-11-12T05:35:28.561-08:00Last poster is quite right! The Beacon was slight...Last poster is quite right! The Beacon was slightly anti-Longoria when the election started, tying his running to being a candidate from Crooked Creek. <br /><br />If Tina had not lied about knowing him, the Beacon would never have found out about the email. <br /><br />Tina never had the strength of character to find her way out of the mess she created, and then she continued to make mistakes of an equally grave nature - aligning with the ultra-protectionists, opposing the Mayor, threatening respected businessmen, and misrepresenting Longoria's platform. <br /><br />Her whole campaign painted her as an irrational, desperate candidate of questionable character. And yes, she painted the canvas herself.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21862313.post-20491933421116948992009-11-12T04:02:00.801-08:002009-11-12T04:02:00.801-08:00If you go back and read the paper, they didn't...If you go back and read the paper, they didn't start off ticked off at Tina. It was only after they published that story where she said she didn't know Joe.<br /><br />Well, to give her the benefit of the doubt, maybe she didn't "know" him, but when the emails of her bribe came out proving she lied the paper obviously didn't like that too much. The press usually doesn't take well to being lied to.<br /><br />She should have taken responsibility then. If she had, she'd have been reelected.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21862313.post-90079536375742270182009-11-12T03:49:59.220-08:002009-11-12T03:49:59.220-08:00It also appears once again that all that Tina can ...It also appears once again that all that Tina can do is to "shoot the messenger" whether that is O'Brien, Fredericks or someone else. Denial is not just a river in Egypt, Tina! Take some responsiblity for your actions!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21862313.post-34481492095787740962009-11-12T03:47:24.372-08:002009-11-12T03:47:24.372-08:00More to the point, and Jason missed the point in h...More to the point, and Jason missed the point in his article -she didn't just use her city email to PERSUADE him, she used her city email to BRIBE him as the state statute defines it. And THAT is why she lost, combined with Longoria running a very effective campaign. And I agree - all the Beacon did was publicize what Tina did.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21862313.post-65367464068618637082009-11-11T17:14:06.916-08:002009-11-11T17:14:06.916-08:00Please get a clue first poster. Tina did not lose ...Please get a clue first poster. Tina did not lose because of Fredricks, she lost because she used a city email and the denied it, kept rambling on and on about what "she" had done, split apart from Joe Lockwood and the rest of mainstream citizens, and most importantly jumped in with the slate of canidates with the weak story backed by Julie bailey. Those people drug her down and she made the decision herself, not the Beacon. Julie Bailey tainted her and it showed in the poles as she got the same percentage as Julie's other canidates.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21862313.post-5709435422764588932009-11-11T16:16:55.470-08:002009-11-11T16:16:55.470-08:00Thank you for your points. We are in the process o...Thank you for your points. We are in the process of publishing a story and the new poll will be a part of that. <br /><br />Please be patient; the new poll should be up before week's end.<br /><br />Keep safe,<br /><br />Tim Enloe<br />Magnolia Media, LLC<br />Power Realty<br />770 653 0552Tim Enloehttp://accessmilton.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21862313.post-32241009786630121542009-11-11T16:04:30.046-08:002009-11-11T16:04:30.046-08:00Tim, can you take the poll down now, it's over...Tim, can you take the poll down now, it's over please. And the reason Longoria did win was because of the accusations John Fredericks made out of the emails. Amazing how you can't have an editorial printed unless you subscribe, but the week the Beacon ran D'Aversa on the front page, he threw out his newspapers all over Milton for Free. That smells to high heaven!! John Fredericks sure had a H on for D'Aversa. Maybe because of his advances being shut down. The really great thing out of this is that so many people now realize what an idiot John Fredericks is of the Beacon and how his newspaper has no credibility and is that of a tabloid at best. What an epiphany for the public.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com